ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
* SPACE
 HEALTH
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 ARTS & STYLE
 NATURE
 IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 myCNN

 Headline News brief
 news quiz
 daily almanac

  MULTIMEDIA:
 video
 video archive
 audio
 multimedia showcase
 more services

  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:

  sci-tech > space > story page corner   
banner

NASA: Human error caused loss of Mars orbiter

orbiter
Illustration of the Mars Climate Orbiter  

November 10, 1999
Web posted at: 4:27 p.m. EST (2127 GMT)


In this story:

Report Summary

Signs of trouble came early

Will Polar Lander be safe?

RELATED STORIES, SITES icon



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Failure to convert English measures to metric values was the root cause of the loss of the Mars Climate Orbiter, a spacecraft that smashed into the planet instead of reaching a safe orbit, a NASA investigation concluded Wednesday.

In a scathing report released Wednesday, an investigation board concluded that NASA engineers failed to convert English measures of rocket thrusts to newton, a metric system measuring rocket force.

  MESSAGE BOARD
Destination Mars
 
  INTERACTIVE 3-D VRML
Manipulate the Mars Global Surveyor
 
 VIDEO
VideoCNN's Miles O'Brien looks at the mismanagement report
Real 28K 80K
Windows Media 28K 80K

VideoCNN's Miles O'Brien explains the last minute changes being made as the Mars Polar Lander mission draws near.
QuickTime Play
Real 28K 80K
Windows Media 28K 80K

One English pound of force equals 4.45 newtons. A small difference between the two values caused the spacecraft to approach Mars at too low an altitude and the craft is thought to have smashed into the planet's atmosphere and was destroyed.

The report cited other contributing causes to the September 23 failure, including:

  • Undetected mistakes in modeling of spacecraft velocity changes.

  • Insufficient familiarity with the spacecraft on the part of the navigation team.

  • Inadequate training.

  • Inadequate communications between project teams.

    The report also said the mission navigation team was overworked and not closely supervised by independent experts.

    The panel made 10 different recommendations to ensure that a similar mishap is avoided with the Mars Polar Lander, currently en route for a December 10 touchdown on the red planet.

    lander
    Artist's conception of the Polar Lander on Mars  

    Initially, NASA officials associated the failure with the agency's so-called "better-faster-cheaper" approach to unmanned space exploration -- a philosophy adopted in recent years that accepts a higher margin of risk in order to launch frequent missions at lower cost.

    But NASA has since conceded that the failure was primarily the result of human error and that cost-cutting had little if anything to do with the fiasco.

    The spacecraft was to be a key part of the exploration of the planet. From its position overhead, the Mars Climate Orbiter was to relay signals from the Mars Polar Lander once it reached the surface of the planet.

    Signs of trouble came early

    Months before the Climate Orbiter reached Mars, controllers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory saw signs of trouble but failed to understand the implications until it was too late.

    "When the earlier trajectory work was being done it was noticed that the predictions ... were not as exquisitely accurate as they normally are," said mission controller Ben Clark of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics.

    Such computer predictions are crucial because Earth-bound antennas offer controllers a one-dimensional and thus incomplete picture of where to find a spacecraft. But the discrepancies were so slight, the team simply discounted the predictions.

    The Mars Climate Orbiter was equipped with one large solar array on one side, which was bombarded with millions of tiny solar particles as the spacecraft traveled to Mars. This solar "wind" tended to roll the spacecraft over.

    A flywheel on board spun in the opposite direction to correct for the wind. Each day when it reset by spinning back the other way, tiny thrusters fired to counteract those forces.

    Over a nine-month period, these small thruster activities gave the spacecraft more of a push off-course than controllers were able to track with their available data, said Richard Zurek, a project scientist for the mission.

    Will Polar Lander be safe?

    The prime contractor for the mission, Lockheed Martin, measured the thruster firings in pounds even though NASA had requested metric measurements. That sent the Climate Orbiter in too low, where the $125-million spacecraft burned up or broke apart in Mars' atmosphere.

    That incident has prompted some 11th hour considerations about how to safely fly the Polar Lander.

    "Everybody really wants to make sure that all the issues have been looked at," says Karen McBride, a member of the UCLA Mars Polar Lander science team.

    The Polar Lander blasted off on January 3 from Cape Canaveral, Florida.

    The spacecraft is designed to use a robotic arm to dig for water ice in the martian soil and conduct other science experiments in Mars' southern polar region

    Correspondent Miles O'Brien and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Report Summary:

    From the Mars Climate Orbiter Investigation Panel report


    Root cause: Failure to use metric units in the coding of a ground software file, "Small Forces," used in trajectory models

     

    Contributing causes:

    1. Undetected mismodeling of spacecraft velocity changes
    2. Navigation Team unfamiliar with spacecraft
    3. Trajectory correction maneuver number 5 not performed
    4. System engineering process did not adequately address transition from development to operations
    5. Inadequate communications between project elements
    6. Inadequate operations Navigation Team staffing
    7. Inadequate training
    8. Verification and validation process did not adequately address ground software
    Recommendations:
    • Verify the consistent use of units throughout the MPL spacecraft design and operations
    • Conduct software audit for specification compliance on all data transferred between JPL and Lockheed Martin Astronautics
    • Verify Small Forces models used for MPL
    • Compare prime MPL navigation projections with projections by alternate navigation methods
    • Train Navigation Team in spacecraft design and operations Prepare for possibility of executing trajectory correction
    • maneuver number 5
    • Establish MPL systems organization to concentrate on trajectory
    • correction maneuver number 5 and entry, descent and landing
    • operations
    • Take steps to improve communications


    RELATED STORIES:
    Surveyor's camera catches martian solar eclipse
    November 3, 1999
    Lander to listen for the sounds of Mars
    November 1, 1999
    Course of Mars Lander corrected for December landing
    October 30, 1999
    NASA decides to stick with original Mars landing site
    October 26, 1999
    Mars Polar Lander team considers back-up landing site
    October 22, 1999
    Three panels to investigate Mars orbiter loss
    September 28, 1999
    NASA gives up search for missing Mars orbiter
    September 24, 1999
    Mars craft possibly dead
    September 23, 1999

    RELATED SITES:
    Mars Polar Lander
    Mars Climate Orbiter/Mars Polar Lander Official Website
    Mars Global Surveyor
    Mars Meteorite Home Page (JPL)
    Macquarie University
    Stromatolites
    Fossil Record of the Cyanobacteria
    Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
    External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
     LATEST HEADLINES:
  • SEARCH CNN.com
    Enter keyword(s)   go    help

    Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines.